Merry Christmas! Have a great day!
Gareth
Thursday 25 December 2008
Friday 21 November 2008
Money for nothing? (or worse?)
Hands up anyone who enjoys political propaganda so much that they think they should be charged for it?
...
?
What? Where is the crowd of happy punters throwing their cash around with gleeful abandon?
OK, before the men in white coats come along I'd better explain what I'm getting at.
During last night's Community Government Task and Finish Group at the council I was astonished to hear the argument being made that the taxpayer should actually pay for councillors to have websites through which they can air their views, make political points and generally tell the world how wonderful they are.
Now I can see the case for councillors maintaining websites (or better yet blogs!) and even for these being linked to from the council website with a suitable disclaimer but why on earth should we pay to hear from our elected representatives?
Readers will know how critical I am of the established party system and of the way in which politicians "communicate" with their constituents or prospective constituents around election time. Imagine actually being charged for such drivel!
Any person who takes themselves seriously as a politician should be able to broadcast their activity and views through means such as blogs without burdening the taxpayer. But even accepting the idea that the council should pay for websites they must be policed in such a way to stop them being abused.
The disgraceful Labour MP Paul Flynn has just demonstrated why there is a need to police taxpayer funded communication.
Now we are in a recession it is more important than ever to be careful with taxpayers' money. If we are looking for savings this should be one of the first.
In the meantime what is wrong with free blogging of the sort practised by myself, David Clifford and Brian Parker?
...
?
What? Where is the crowd of happy punters throwing their cash around with gleeful abandon?
OK, before the men in white coats come along I'd better explain what I'm getting at.
During last night's Community Government Task and Finish Group at the council I was astonished to hear the argument being made that the taxpayer should actually pay for councillors to have websites through which they can air their views, make political points and generally tell the world how wonderful they are.
Now I can see the case for councillors maintaining websites (or better yet blogs!) and even for these being linked to from the council website with a suitable disclaimer but why on earth should we pay to hear from our elected representatives?
Readers will know how critical I am of the established party system and of the way in which politicians "communicate" with their constituents or prospective constituents around election time. Imagine actually being charged for such drivel!
Any person who takes themselves seriously as a politician should be able to broadcast their activity and views through means such as blogs without burdening the taxpayer. But even accepting the idea that the council should pay for websites they must be policed in such a way to stop them being abused.
The disgraceful Labour MP Paul Flynn has just demonstrated why there is a need to police taxpayer funded communication.
Now we are in a recession it is more important than ever to be careful with taxpayers' money. If we are looking for savings this should be one of the first.
In the meantime what is wrong with free blogging of the sort practised by myself, David Clifford and Brian Parker?
Tuesday 18 November 2008
The Emperor Has No Clothes!
Here Boris Johnson says it like it is.
The outrageous hubris of this government seeking to blame George Osborne for the fall in the pound can only really be compared to the idea of the royal courtiers and tailors in The Emperor's New Clothes blaming the little boy for the fact that everyone is laughing at the Monarch.
Gordon Brown and his cohort of identikit incompetent ministers have denuded the pound of any value and made the UK a truly dreadful place to do business.
When no one wants pounds because there are no British goods to buy and when no one wants to keep their savings in pounds because interest rates have had to be slashed to their lowest rate for fifty years it really takes some gall to blame the Shadow Chancellor for pointing out that something's not quite right here!
Get a grip Gordon! Preferably on something with a considerable voltage going through it and let someone who knows what they're doing take over- NOW!
UPDATE- At last! Since Brown never intended to stick to his borrowing projections it's about time that we ditched his spending plans! Good work DC- now let's see those taxes going down and spending re-entering stratospheric levels!
The outrageous hubris of this government seeking to blame George Osborne for the fall in the pound can only really be compared to the idea of the royal courtiers and tailors in The Emperor's New Clothes blaming the little boy for the fact that everyone is laughing at the Monarch.
Gordon Brown and his cohort of identikit incompetent ministers have denuded the pound of any value and made the UK a truly dreadful place to do business.
When no one wants pounds because there are no British goods to buy and when no one wants to keep their savings in pounds because interest rates have had to be slashed to their lowest rate for fifty years it really takes some gall to blame the Shadow Chancellor for pointing out that something's not quite right here!
Get a grip Gordon! Preferably on something with a considerable voltage going through it and let someone who knows what they're doing take over- NOW!
UPDATE- At last! Since Brown never intended to stick to his borrowing projections it's about time that we ditched his spending plans! Good work DC- now let's see those taxes going down and spending re-entering stratospheric levels!
Monday 17 November 2008
Traffic Calming?
What is expensive, ugly, bad for your car, bad for the environment and completely ineffective and unfit for purpose?
OK, so you've probably named about twenty things that fall into that category just now. so let's narrow the parametres a little to exclude members of The Cabinet and other senior Labour Party figures. This leaves us with one particular nuisance that we can get rid of- speed bumps.
OK, so you've probably named about twenty things that fall into that category just now. so let's narrow the parametres a little to exclude members of The Cabinet and other senior Labour Party figures. This leaves us with one particular nuisance that we can get rid of- speed bumps.
Rushmoor already has a policy in place against such "traffic calming measures" on the simple basis that the don't work, are bad for the environment, damage people's cars and end up creating more noise than there was in the first place.
Avenue Road is extremely bad in this regard- forcing people to practically crawl down the hill or to take a massive detour round through Rectory Road.
Most people accept that speed bumps are, to use the technical term "stupid" but not many realise just how bad they are. A study in Canada has now shown that because people speed up and slow down more often between speed bumps, that consumption of fossil fuels is actually worse than if people were maintaining a higher speed straight through.
Yes, I know we should try and control speed and yes it would be nice if people didn't speed up and slow down as well all know they do. But surely we should legislate for the world as it is, not as we imagine it ought to be?
In some places we do need to control speeds- Marrowbrook Lane is an example of this- with some people using it as a rat run in the mornings. It is in these places that it actually makes sense to deploy speed cameras or speed visors to enforce a safe speed. There are plenty of speed cameras around- we just need to take them away from their more profitable but less useful locations on the main roads and actually use them to protect residents.
All of this is to say that I will be making a big issue of this in council. We have already accepted that speed bumps are no good- so let's get rid of them!
I'm due to meet traffic officers soon and will bring this up with them. You'll read about the outcome here first.
Friday 7 November 2008
Starbucks in Farnborough?
Good news for fellow coffee drinkers out there- following a decision of the Development and Control committee on Wednesday we are now due to get a coffee house/cafe in a prominent location right in the heart of Empress Ward.
One area that I have constantly been saying that we need to improve in Farnborough is the appearance of the town when people are arriving in it. One of the worst offenders in this regard is the old HSBC building on the corner of Victoria Road and Farnborough Road.
Listed by Historic Farnborough as one of the worst eyesores in the borough, this building has been standing empty for over a year and is frankly depressing. As the building was designed and built in the 1960s I can only speculate on what substances those involved may have been on at the time when they decided that people might like to live or work in this Soviet style concrete elephant of a building!
Luckily, we have now approved an application for a hotel to revamp (its a pity we couldn't demolish it and start again) and reuse the site. In addition to this they will be building a cafe in the space currently occupied by the concrete stilts that the building is on.
As this area is currently a site for antisocial behaviour and youth drinking I think this is a fantastic idea. It will also provide a much more pleasant spectacle for people driving in to Farnborough and will be great for those of us who like coffee!
We do not yet know who will occupy the cafe but we can only hope it is one of those commercial chains like Starbucks who so annoy the whinging left but who happen to serve good coffee in a nice environment.
Farnborough is taking off!
Thursday 6 November 2008
Start your clocks...
Amidst all excitement about potential cuts in mortgage rates (for that is all they are so far) it seems churlish to point out that the economy is heading to hell in a handcart but as John McCain has shown- the right aren't in this game to be popular.So here goes:
First up- the interest rate cut. Expect to hear calls from generous government ministers (they are so good at giving other people's money away) for banks to pass on the interest rate cut to householders. Neither the proper banks nor their nationalised emasculated counterparts will pass anything like the full cut on- they've got to make up their losses somehow. The government will howl with outrage about this and subsequently blame much of the downturn on the banks (and of course on Norman Lamont, Dominic Lawson, Harold MacMillan and William Pitt)
Next- the pound. Having lived in a country whose currency was so weak that even some official bodies refused to accept it I can tell you that what is going to happen is not pretty. The government's excessive borrowing, the public's excessive borrowing, the absolute unproductivity of the UK workforce (more regulation anyone?) leading to a pathetic balance of payments situation means that there will be very little demand for pounds but huge oversupply. For anyone who doesn't understand economics out there or who is a Prime Minister who pretends to- that is what we call a BAD THING. It leads to a collapse in the price of the currency. This in turn makes it very very expensive to buy things from overseas. In the UK that is everything unless you were wondering.
Currency value induced inflation has historically been subject to constant fluctuations. Not any more. The weak pound is here to stay for as long as economy is managed the way it is.
OK, so that's the mild part out of the way. Now for the real problems:
All that borrowing needs to be paid for- we need to borrow from someone. Most UK national debt is now held overseas. To increase borrowing we need to persuade lenders that it is worth their doing so. The thing is- with government interest rates so low and the pound being the currency equivalent of a man walking round town with a sick chicken fewer people will want to lend to the government.
This leaves the government with the unthinkable option of cutting spending, or the Brownite solution- raise taxes. This is of course bad in its self. It will be worse because it will further undermine productivity and enterprise.
And just around the corner is the real kicker- inflation. It takes a special kind of genius to achieve both recession and inflation at the same time. It is called Stagflation and we had it in the seventies and it is not pretty. Friedman demonstrated it to be the inevitable result of Keynesian economics, common sense reinforces this. The trouble is that a lot of left wing politicians and economists had already fallen in love with Keynes and big government by then.
Reflating the economy on credit as the government is trying to do is just the same as printing money- it won't mean that any more goods or services are produced. Unfortunately, as the economy tanks more people will end up on benefits- leading to ever more government spending which we can't afford.
The result= we end up where we also end up under Labour- going to the IMF cap in hand. Mark my words- it is now a matter of time. Start your clocks now...
First up- the interest rate cut. Expect to hear calls from generous government ministers (they are so good at giving other people's money away) for banks to pass on the interest rate cut to householders. Neither the proper banks nor their nationalised emasculated counterparts will pass anything like the full cut on- they've got to make up their losses somehow. The government will howl with outrage about this and subsequently blame much of the downturn on the banks (and of course on Norman Lamont, Dominic Lawson, Harold MacMillan and William Pitt)
Next- the pound. Having lived in a country whose currency was so weak that even some official bodies refused to accept it I can tell you that what is going to happen is not pretty. The government's excessive borrowing, the public's excessive borrowing, the absolute unproductivity of the UK workforce (more regulation anyone?) leading to a pathetic balance of payments situation means that there will be very little demand for pounds but huge oversupply. For anyone who doesn't understand economics out there or who is a Prime Minister who pretends to- that is what we call a BAD THING. It leads to a collapse in the price of the currency. This in turn makes it very very expensive to buy things from overseas. In the UK that is everything unless you were wondering.
Currency value induced inflation has historically been subject to constant fluctuations. Not any more. The weak pound is here to stay for as long as economy is managed the way it is.
OK, so that's the mild part out of the way. Now for the real problems:
All that borrowing needs to be paid for- we need to borrow from someone. Most UK national debt is now held overseas. To increase borrowing we need to persuade lenders that it is worth their doing so. The thing is- with government interest rates so low and the pound being the currency equivalent of a man walking round town with a sick chicken fewer people will want to lend to the government.
This leaves the government with the unthinkable option of cutting spending, or the Brownite solution- raise taxes. This is of course bad in its self. It will be worse because it will further undermine productivity and enterprise.
And just around the corner is the real kicker- inflation. It takes a special kind of genius to achieve both recession and inflation at the same time. It is called Stagflation and we had it in the seventies and it is not pretty. Friedman demonstrated it to be the inevitable result of Keynesian economics, common sense reinforces this. The trouble is that a lot of left wing politicians and economists had already fallen in love with Keynes and big government by then.
Reflating the economy on credit as the government is trying to do is just the same as printing money- it won't mean that any more goods or services are produced. Unfortunately, as the economy tanks more people will end up on benefits- leading to ever more government spending which we can't afford.
The result= we end up where we also end up under Labour- going to the IMF cap in hand. Mark my words- it is now a matter of time. Start your clocks now...
Monday 27 October 2008
Taxation- My views explained
One of this blog's regular readers- Jo has pointed out that my last post might imply that I am in favour of a universal poll tax to replace income tax. For the sake of clarity I thought it would be best to state out the Lyon Tax Plan in full:
I operate from two clear principles:
1. Taxation is a bad thing. It might seem surprising to have to state as much but given recent governments' addiction to expensive programmes and their unerring certainty that they must be the best people to decide how money is spent.
We must never forget that people work hard for their money. We are able to tax them because government has a monopoly of organised violence in a country. We don't know what they would spend it on otherwise but I'm sure we would all agree that violence is a bad thing and that we should avoid using it, or threatening to use it, whenever we can. We should therefore tax only when absolutely necessary.
Taxation is most reprehensible when it denies people the means to pay their own way, or when it endangers economic activity that could allow people to do so.
2. We do need some taxation. This is unfortunate but we need a police force, courts, armed forces and various other odds and ends. These cost something.
We must therefore:
CUT- Capital Gains Tax, Stamp duty and similar (these are a tax on enterprise and investment)
INCREASE- VAT, specifically on goods and services which have "negative externallities," that is, things which damage other people as a side-effect.
REDUCE AND SIMPLIFY- We should take as many people out of income tax as possible but not use the tax system to hand out "credits" as the current unelected regime does. The band below which people do not get taxed should be raised to well above a living wage (say £20k) and a flat tax should be instituted on those above it.
Ideally we should not tax anyone on income at all (A tax on work? Which brainbox thought that one up?) but as long as we need one lets reduce and simplify it. This may put a load of pointless civil servants out of a job (kind of like how living longer puts undertakers out of work) It will however cut costs, allow further tax cuts and make it easier to calculate how much tax you owe- thereby further raising the tax yield.
As this applies to the story below it would lead to cuts in the bills for all payers (even the big earners) and mean that fewer people had to pay it.
The sooner we accept that taxation is a bad thing the sooner we will come round to my solution of reducing it for everyone and eliminating it for as many people as possible.
I operate from two clear principles:
1. Taxation is a bad thing. It might seem surprising to have to state as much but given recent governments' addiction to expensive programmes and their unerring certainty that they must be the best people to decide how money is spent.
We must never forget that people work hard for their money. We are able to tax them because government has a monopoly of organised violence in a country. We don't know what they would spend it on otherwise but I'm sure we would all agree that violence is a bad thing and that we should avoid using it, or threatening to use it, whenever we can. We should therefore tax only when absolutely necessary.
Taxation is most reprehensible when it denies people the means to pay their own way, or when it endangers economic activity that could allow people to do so.
2. We do need some taxation. This is unfortunate but we need a police force, courts, armed forces and various other odds and ends. These cost something.
We must therefore:
CUT- Capital Gains Tax, Stamp duty and similar (these are a tax on enterprise and investment)
INCREASE- VAT, specifically on goods and services which have "negative externallities," that is, things which damage other people as a side-effect.
REDUCE AND SIMPLIFY- We should take as many people out of income tax as possible but not use the tax system to hand out "credits" as the current unelected regime does. The band below which people do not get taxed should be raised to well above a living wage (say £20k) and a flat tax should be instituted on those above it.
Ideally we should not tax anyone on income at all (A tax on work? Which brainbox thought that one up?) but as long as we need one lets reduce and simplify it. This may put a load of pointless civil servants out of a job (kind of like how living longer puts undertakers out of work) It will however cut costs, allow further tax cuts and make it easier to calculate how much tax you owe- thereby further raising the tax yield.
As this applies to the story below it would lead to cuts in the bills for all payers (even the big earners) and mean that fewer people had to pay it.
The sooner we accept that taxation is a bad thing the sooner we will come round to my solution of reducing it for everyone and eliminating it for as many people as possible.
Thursday 23 October 2008
Taxation
I have just received this as an email forward. I am genuinely impressed. This is a point that really needs to be made a lot more often and a lot more clearly:
Bar Stool Economics
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. 'Since you are all such good customers, he said, 'I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes, so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'
They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings)
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free.
But once outside the bar the men began to compare their savings.'I only got a dollar out of the $20,'declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,' but he got $10!
''Yeah, that's right,' exclaimed the fifth man. 'I only saved a dollar too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!
''That's true!!' shouted the seventh man. 'Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!
''Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
Bar Stool Economics
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. 'Since you are all such good customers, he said, 'I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes, so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'
They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings)
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free.
But once outside the bar the men began to compare their savings.'I only got a dollar out of the $20,'declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,' but he got $10!
''Yeah, that's right,' exclaimed the fifth man. 'I only saved a dollar too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!
''That's true!!' shouted the seventh man. 'Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!
''Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
Wednesday 22 October 2008
Fireworks!
For anyone interested in attending, St Peter's Church, Farnborough, will be having a fantastic fireworks display on Saturday 1st November behind the church. Tickets are available from The Triangle bookshop in the town centre.The buildings are a thousand years old so they are really showing a lot of faith in one of their elected representatives in letting me help with firing the rockets- I can't give any guarantees about which direction they'll be flying in!
It would be great to see you there. There will be huge bonfire too and some great food.
One quick point is that is you see me running around with a fuse this should not be taken as a sudden conversion to the views of Guy Fawkes!!
Tuesday 21 October 2008
Neighbourhood Watch
As promised in my election materials- one the top priorities that I and my fellow councillors have is to secure 100% Neighbourhood Watch coverage for Empress. The benefits of this will be not just safer homes but also closer communities and a stronger deterrent effect against petty crimes and anti-social behaviour.
I have already started going round the Marrowbrook and the streets off it and have been impressed at the levels of engagement shown. We are also starting from quite a high level of coverage and I do think that this aim is
In many areas people believe that they have a Neighbourhood Watch because they have signs on their streets but a lot of these have died off as people have left the areas.
Neighbourhood Watches are exactly the sort of community involvement that I have been arguing for over recent years- they show that people can take responsibility for their own areas and do things effectively without the need for government legislation. For this reason, as well as all the benefits they can deliver, I am determined to make this succeed.
So whilst I'll be going round most evenings and weekends there is also a challenge to you. Can you be a coordinator for your area? If so let me know and I'll link you up to our excellent beat officers who will do all they can to help.
I have already started going round the Marrowbrook and the streets off it and have been impressed at the levels of engagement shown. We are also starting from quite a high level of coverage and I do think that this aim is
In many areas people believe that they have a Neighbourhood Watch because they have signs on their streets but a lot of these have died off as people have left the areas.
Neighbourhood Watches are exactly the sort of community involvement that I have been arguing for over recent years- they show that people can take responsibility for their own areas and do things effectively without the need for government legislation. For this reason, as well as all the benefits they can deliver, I am determined to make this succeed.
So whilst I'll be going round most evenings and weekends there is also a challenge to you. Can you be a coordinator for your area? If so let me know and I'll link you up to our excellent beat officers who will do all they can to help.
Monday 20 October 2008
Break's Over
Dear Reader,
As you may have noticed, things have been pretty quiet on this blog of late: between password difficulties, an amazingly busy couple of months and various internet problem this blog has been about as much use as a nationalised bank. But there is one thing we can learn from politicians of the left- relaunches.
I prefer to talk about positive, inspiring and useful things- so will not refer to the Prime Minister, there is a better example out there anyway...
Thats right... break's over, big issues to tackle- Neighbourhood watch to set up in Marrowbrook, parking reforms needed in Union Street, a town centre to finish and unfunded mandates to fight and a need for new cycle routes.You'll hear about it here first.
Thursday 12 June 2008
Taking a Stand
I can't help but admire the principled stand that David Davis is taking against the government's uber-authoritarian decision to grant themselves the power to lock people up for six weeks without any kind of charge.
To be honest I was utterly lost for words. I think most people were. Nevertheless, our gallant media have stepped in and not allowed the fact that they have nothing sensible to say to get in the way of their saying it.
As a liberal democracy we either stand up for justice and due process or we are lost. We have sacrificed enough liberty to the incompetent scare-mongers in Whitehall and Mr Davis recognises this. On ID Cards, surveillance and detention without trial we have reached a turning point. It's time to stand up and be counted.
I for one will be backing David Davis.
Friday 23 May 2008
Hair Off!
So, I've spent much of the past few days explaining my sudden change of hairstyle as shown in this photo.
To deal with a number of questions-
No- this is not an attempt to render myself unrecognisable to my constituents after the recent election (This being a tactic that Labour governments have been very keen to make use of the in past)
No- this does not indicate any shift in party loyalties
No- this is not a show of solidarity with William Hague, Iain Duncan Smith and John McCain.
What happened is that we were holding an event at work to raise money for the Phylis Tuckwell hospice and somehow I got talked into taking part in a sponsored head shave...
Anyway thanks to all of you who sponsored me and for all of you who have refrained from jokes about polishing...
Tuesday 13 May 2008
Face Off
OK, so there's a new sheriff in town and its time to take down one of the fiercest foes of peaceful Farnborough- the scourge of our streets, the plight of our parks, the terror of the town centre...
I am talking of course of abandoned shopping trolleys...
That's right- I'm declaring war on these annoying pests found all over the streets that make the place look untidy and get in the way of cyclists.
If you see one of these anywhere please give the Council's customer services number a call on 01252 398399 and get it zapped- I'll keep you posted as we attempt to regain our streets from this metallic menace...
Wednesday 7 May 2008
The Beginning...
First of all my apologies for neglecting my blog over the past week or so- election week was really frantic this year and the results have only just sunk in.
Secondly my congratulations and thanks to all who helped in the campaign and to all those who won their own campaigns- especially to Boris Johnson- a great success and a real turning point for the Conservatives!
Anyway, now the real hard work begins and I'm really looking forward to it. I'll keep you posted here of all developments.
Watch This Web Space
Secondly my congratulations and thanks to all who helped in the campaign and to all those who won their own campaigns- especially to Boris Johnson- a great success and a real turning point for the Conservatives!
Anyway, now the real hard work begins and I'm really looking forward to it. I'll keep you posted here of all developments.
Watch This Web Space
Friday 25 April 2008
Bike Stolen!
One of the worst results of Ken Livingstone's incompetence in running London has been the rise in so called "petty crime" such as bike thefts.
It says something about the attitude of the left that such a such a description is being used more and more. Crime is crime and is often more closely felt when it concerns items of lower economic value.
We really do need to arrest this problem at its lowest level. The success of Mayor Giuliani's campaign for Broken Windows policing in New York shows how successful this can be.
Anyway now to the point of the article- yesterday when I was out canvassing my bike was nicked. So if you see a fairly muddy silver coloured SUS 550 left anywhere around the town please let me know! This is very annoying!
It says something about the attitude of the left that such a such a description is being used more and more. Crime is crime and is often more closely felt when it concerns items of lower economic value.
We really do need to arrest this problem at its lowest level. The success of Mayor Giuliani's campaign for Broken Windows policing in New York shows how successful this can be.
Anyway now to the point of the article- yesterday when I was out canvassing my bike was nicked. So if you see a fairly muddy silver coloured SUS 550 left anywhere around the town please let me know! This is very annoying!
Thursday 24 April 2008
Managing Expectations...
One of the most unusual things about modern politics that seems to have gained acceptance is the idea of managing expectations.
The ongoing build up to the US Election is a great example of this, but we there are many instances in the US.
Immediately prior to any vote both sides will be overcome with fits of depression and self-deprecation. No one is confident of victory, no one talks about wiping out their opponents- everything is said to be marginal and everyone is the underdog.
Of course there are very good psychological reasons for doing so. If you do better than expected you can gain momentum- both for future elections and in office.
No one likes arrogance and voters are often turned-off by tough talk. There is also the danger that your own voters will not bother and will stay at home.
The media too are likely to attack any campaign for being too honest about its prospects. Barack Obama's campaign has been accused of naivety in making some positive predictions in the past, whilst ham fisted lies, such as those Alistair Campbell specialised in to make elections seem closer, are usually depicted as cunning and shrewd.
The trouble with this is that we end up carrying these assumptions on into government. Talking down our prospects, talking up the barriers and finding any possible excuse to fail. All of this makes for a safe and well insulated government. Safe? Maybe. Honest? Questionably. What people want? I doubt it.
There is a certain honest beauty in putting aside all of these mind games. So what if we have to do better if people expect more of us? Let's not manage expectations- lets do better!
Let's not play the hero- let's be genuinely heroic. Let's not keep lowering the bar and congratulating ourselves for our lilliputian achievements. Let us cast the bar up as high as we can possibly imagine- We can reach it.
The ongoing build up to the US Election is a great example of this, but we there are many instances in the US.
Immediately prior to any vote both sides will be overcome with fits of depression and self-deprecation. No one is confident of victory, no one talks about wiping out their opponents- everything is said to be marginal and everyone is the underdog.
Of course there are very good psychological reasons for doing so. If you do better than expected you can gain momentum- both for future elections and in office.
No one likes arrogance and voters are often turned-off by tough talk. There is also the danger that your own voters will not bother and will stay at home.
The media too are likely to attack any campaign for being too honest about its prospects. Barack Obama's campaign has been accused of naivety in making some positive predictions in the past, whilst ham fisted lies, such as those Alistair Campbell specialised in to make elections seem closer, are usually depicted as cunning and shrewd.
The trouble with this is that we end up carrying these assumptions on into government. Talking down our prospects, talking up the barriers and finding any possible excuse to fail. All of this makes for a safe and well insulated government. Safe? Maybe. Honest? Questionably. What people want? I doubt it.
There is a certain honest beauty in putting aside all of these mind games. So what if we have to do better if people expect more of us? Let's not manage expectations- lets do better!
Let's not play the hero- let's be genuinely heroic. Let's not keep lowering the bar and congratulating ourselves for our lilliputian achievements. Let us cast the bar up as high as we can possibly imagine- We can reach it.
Wednesday 23 April 2008
A load of rubbish!
I received an email today pointing out that some parts of Farnborough are developing a litter problem.
It is a real shame when a green and pleasant town like ours ends up with a problem like this. I am also of the opinion that litter leads to worse problems, as people are less likely to respect the streets and more likely to feel miserable and aggressive.
I'll certainly be keeping my eyes open during the last week of the campaign for this issue. Please do let me know if you see this as a problem in your area
It is a real shame when a green and pleasant town like ours ends up with a problem like this. I am also of the opinion that litter leads to worse problems, as people are less likely to respect the streets and more likely to feel miserable and aggressive.
I'll certainly be keeping my eyes open during the last week of the campaign for this issue. Please do let me know if you see this as a problem in your area
Thursday 17 April 2008
The Ham & Blackbird
I received an email today drawing my attention to the problems people are facing at the Ham & Blackbird roundabout.
I think this is a very important issue- the directions and markings are not really clear enough and the iron railings obscure the view of people driving past. This can make the whole experience of going round it particularly hair raising for cyclists!
If elected this is one of the first issues I will be looking at. To be honest I'm surprised we have not had more accidents there already. Its a very busy roundabout and right in the middle of town and our ward.
Any suggestions for other ways to make it safer would be most welcome
I think this is a very important issue- the directions and markings are not really clear enough and the iron railings obscure the view of people driving past. This can make the whole experience of going round it particularly hair raising for cyclists!
If elected this is one of the first issues I will be looking at. To be honest I'm surprised we have not had more accidents there already. Its a very busy roundabout and right in the middle of town and our ward.
Any suggestions for other ways to make it safer would be most welcome
Tuesday 15 April 2008
Pedestrian?
Out canvassing yesterday one point that was brought up was the difficulty people have in getting to Cove Green.
Cove Green is a great facility and is being improved through the works under way at the moment. It does however suffer from a general problem in Farnborough- lack of pedestrian access.
Crossing roads in Farnborough- especially Victoria Road and Farnborough Road can be very time consuming and annoying as there are long gaps between pedestrian crossings and in places iron railings are in the way of the most convenient places to cross- forcing people hundreds of metres out of their way.
This may seem a relatively small issue, pedestrian even, but I think its just the sort of thing that impacts on people's lives in a negative way.
I get about the place by foot or by bike most of the time and know a lot of people who do the same. I think it would be an admirable goal to make Farnborough more pedestrian friendly and to make it easier for people to access our parks and green spaces.
If elected this is something I will work with our ward councillors to achieve
Cove Green is a great facility and is being improved through the works under way at the moment. It does however suffer from a general problem in Farnborough- lack of pedestrian access.
Crossing roads in Farnborough- especially Victoria Road and Farnborough Road can be very time consuming and annoying as there are long gaps between pedestrian crossings and in places iron railings are in the way of the most convenient places to cross- forcing people hundreds of metres out of their way.
This may seem a relatively small issue, pedestrian even, but I think its just the sort of thing that impacts on people's lives in a negative way.
I get about the place by foot or by bike most of the time and know a lot of people who do the same. I think it would be an admirable goal to make Farnborough more pedestrian friendly and to make it easier for people to access our parks and green spaces.
If elected this is something I will work with our ward councillors to achieve
Friday 11 April 2008
On the Campaign Trail
It as been a great week in the campaign- we have started to make some real progress with canvassing and have had an opportunity to meet a good number of residents in the ward.
Its always a difficult balancing act- wanting to get round to every door to make sure that everyone can have their say whilst also wanting to give everyone time to talk things through properly.
What I find most remarkable is how generous people are being with their time. Both those who are helping out with the campaign and those who answer their doors and take the time to let me know where they stand on the key issues.
I believe that it is the first duty of councillors, and therefore candidates for council, to make themselves available and to meet as many residents as possible. One of the real advantages of local democracy is that you can meet a large part of your ward on a regular basis.
I see this blog as fitting in with that theme. As I have stated before, I am very open to questions, feedback and debate and hope to make this a useful channel for residents to get in touch.
More from the campaign to follow...
Its always a difficult balancing act- wanting to get round to every door to make sure that everyone can have their say whilst also wanting to give everyone time to talk things through properly.
What I find most remarkable is how generous people are being with their time. Both those who are helping out with the campaign and those who answer their doors and take the time to let me know where they stand on the key issues.
I believe that it is the first duty of councillors, and therefore candidates for council, to make themselves available and to meet as many residents as possible. One of the real advantages of local democracy is that you can meet a large part of your ward on a regular basis.
I see this blog as fitting in with that theme. As I have stated before, I am very open to questions, feedback and debate and hope to make this a useful channel for residents to get in touch.
More from the campaign to follow...
Thursday 10 April 2008
Protecting the Character of Farnborough
One issue that has come up time after time on the doorstep over the past few days has been people's fears that Farnborough may end up losing its character through all the development that is taking place at the moment.
It might be worth my declaring an interest at first- I like development: I live in a flat in a building that was only built a few years ago and like it. I also like going out and want to see more bars and restaurants in Farnborough.
That said, I think we all want to avoid becoming just another homogenised town with all the same pubs, restuarants etc. I also think we want to avoid becoming part of the Labour government's "pack 'em in" strategy for the south east.
Some of the developments that are being proposed I am on balance against- there seems to be no corner or space in the vicinity of King George The Fifth playing fields that is not about to be developed into a completely inappropriate building. There are some spaces we can look at building on but its good for the area to have some proper residential housing too.
The closure of The Tumbledown Dick is another cause for concern. It was quite right to close the establishment if it was in breach of health standards but that should be no reason to prevent it re-opening with higher standards- continuing to provide a music scene and some character to our town.
With the new town centre due for completion soon- what kind of shops, bars and restaurants would people like to see open? This is something I will bear in mind if elected in future discussions with developers.
It might be worth my declaring an interest at first- I like development: I live in a flat in a building that was only built a few years ago and like it. I also like going out and want to see more bars and restaurants in Farnborough.
That said, I think we all want to avoid becoming just another homogenised town with all the same pubs, restuarants etc. I also think we want to avoid becoming part of the Labour government's "pack 'em in" strategy for the south east.
Some of the developments that are being proposed I am on balance against- there seems to be no corner or space in the vicinity of King George The Fifth playing fields that is not about to be developed into a completely inappropriate building. There are some spaces we can look at building on but its good for the area to have some proper residential housing too.
The closure of The Tumbledown Dick is another cause for concern. It was quite right to close the establishment if it was in breach of health standards but that should be no reason to prevent it re-opening with higher standards- continuing to provide a music scene and some character to our town.
With the new town centre due for completion soon- what kind of shops, bars and restaurants would people like to see open? This is something I will bear in mind if elected in future discussions with developers.
Tuesday 8 April 2008
A Call for Unity
This has to be an encouraging sign for Conservatives.
In as much as any political party can be said to be genuinely unifying the Conservative Party, with its One Nation beliefs fits the bill.
Mark Penn is a brilliantly adept pollster and has done a great job for those who have employed him. He is however part of the Alistair Campbell, Peter Mandelson, Karl Rove ilk who have succeeded in politics by dividing people.
This is depressingly effective but is too easy.
Politics should be about setting out a broad vision, motivating people by what you stand for and what you intend to achieve and seeking to build on the shared values we have as a nation.
This is why I believe that David Cameron and John McCain have the ability to do so much good for their respective nations. It is time to heal the partisan wounds and divisions that have served the left wing parties so well. We must aim to win in every county, every town and every street of our nation.
In Empress I will try to do my part. I have set myself the goal of convincing every resident and winning every street in the ward.
We are one nation, one borough and one ward. Lets unite and do whats best for Britain, for Rushmoor and for Empress.
In as much as any political party can be said to be genuinely unifying the Conservative Party, with its One Nation beliefs fits the bill.
Mark Penn is a brilliantly adept pollster and has done a great job for those who have employed him. He is however part of the Alistair Campbell, Peter Mandelson, Karl Rove ilk who have succeeded in politics by dividing people.
This is depressingly effective but is too easy.
Politics should be about setting out a broad vision, motivating people by what you stand for and what you intend to achieve and seeking to build on the shared values we have as a nation.
This is why I believe that David Cameron and John McCain have the ability to do so much good for their respective nations. It is time to heal the partisan wounds and divisions that have served the left wing parties so well. We must aim to win in every county, every town and every street of our nation.
In Empress I will try to do my part. I have set myself the goal of convincing every resident and winning every street in the ward.
We are one nation, one borough and one ward. Lets unite and do whats best for Britain, for Rushmoor and for Empress.
Friday 4 April 2008
Rock the Vote!
I do wonder if this is the year that the long awaited "youth vote" will appear in elections?
Both on this side of the Atlantic, with Boris Johnson and on the far side with Barack Obama, there seems to be a strong youth following developing in their campaigns. This is evident both through news coverage and through online activity.
The fact is that youth turnout in elections generally is appalling. This might in part explain the tendency of the current government to slap us about- introducing top-up fees, devaluing degrees and education, the appalling levels of youth unemployment and inactivity, the ever expanding national debt and their willingness to send British troops out to any conflict going. They know they can get away with it because young people don't vote.
What is surprising then is not the emergence of the youth vote (provided it happens) but the ongoing lack of youth involvement in politics more widely.
Come 2009, there is a chance that we will have a new young American President, a newish young French President, a new and young Mayor of London and (if we finally get our election) a new young British Prime Minister.
Having the leaders in place is a start. But popular participation is if anything more important. It may seem a strange call for a Conservative to make- but now is the time for winds of change!
Both on this side of the Atlantic, with Boris Johnson and on the far side with Barack Obama, there seems to be a strong youth following developing in their campaigns. This is evident both through news coverage and through online activity.
The fact is that youth turnout in elections generally is appalling. This might in part explain the tendency of the current government to slap us about- introducing top-up fees, devaluing degrees and education, the appalling levels of youth unemployment and inactivity, the ever expanding national debt and their willingness to send British troops out to any conflict going. They know they can get away with it because young people don't vote.
What is surprising then is not the emergence of the youth vote (provided it happens) but the ongoing lack of youth involvement in politics more widely.
Come 2009, there is a chance that we will have a new young American President, a newish young French President, a new and young Mayor of London and (if we finally get our election) a new young British Prime Minister.
Having the leaders in place is a start. But popular participation is if anything more important. It may seem a strange call for a Conservative to make- but now is the time for winds of change!
Thursday 3 April 2008
Straight Talking Politics
Answering the Question
It occurs to me that in one of the main advantages of blogging in politics is that it allows people to ask you questions unadulterated by mainstream media.
I really do not accept the idea that this can be a weakness. I am confident in my beliefs and believe that they can withstand in-depth scrutiny. I would much rather be proven wrong by well reasoned debate than grow complacent in a set of beliefs that have no practical value.
Those politicians I most admire- William Hague in the UK and Senator John McCain in the US are renowned for their willingness to give clear straightforward answers. Even if people don't always agree with them I think they are more inclined to respect them for their honesty.
Because of all of this and the simple fact that politicians should answer people's questions I make the following commitment:
I will give a clear and straightforward answer to any question put to me about my politics. I will not dodge the difficult ones and I will not engage in spin and jargon to conceal my meaning. I am committed to Straight Talking Politics
It occurs to me that in one of the main advantages of blogging in politics is that it allows people to ask you questions unadulterated by mainstream media.
I really do not accept the idea that this can be a weakness. I am confident in my beliefs and believe that they can withstand in-depth scrutiny. I would much rather be proven wrong by well reasoned debate than grow complacent in a set of beliefs that have no practical value.
Those politicians I most admire- William Hague in the UK and Senator John McCain in the US are renowned for their willingness to give clear straightforward answers. Even if people don't always agree with them I think they are more inclined to respect them for their honesty.
Because of all of this and the simple fact that politicians should answer people's questions I make the following commitment:
I will give a clear and straightforward answer to any question put to me about my politics. I will not dodge the difficult ones and I will not engage in spin and jargon to conceal my meaning. I am committed to Straight Talking Politics
Wednesday 2 April 2008
Introduction
Hi,
I am happy to say that I am now formally the Conservative Party Candidate for Empress Ward in Farnborough.
I have lived in Farnborough since mid 2006 and work locally. I have also been actively involved in politics for 11 years.
For me the top issues in Farnborough are:
1. Making sure that our town centre is developed in a way that maximises its benefit to residents and local businesses.
It has been a long time coming but I think the new town centre could do wonders for the life and economy of Farnborough.
It would be great to have more facilities and to see the character of our town redeveloped- and to benefit from the new jobs that would bring. We must however be careful to make sure that Farnborough doesn't become just another town. We need to keep what is best about our town whilst embracing change.
2. Ensuring that we look after our green spaces and facilities
Having lived in many towns throughout the UK I can honestly say that Farnborough is very well catered for in terms of parks, green spaces and sports facilities. We do need to make sure that they stay pleasant and accessible to all. It is easy to underestimate the impact that these kind of facilities can have in adding to the good character of the town, reducing anti-social behaviour and benefiting local property prices. Lets keep Farnborough green!
3. Cleaning up our streets
Crime, vandalism and litter are a blight on modern Britain and getting steadily worse under the national current government. Rushmoor is doing well to keep these threats under control and I am determined to do my bit on the council to protect Farnborough from the return of these depressing and disappointing afflictions of modern Britain
4. Traffic and Parking
Always an annoyance. It is tempting to believe that these problems can be solved overnight but so long as car numbers keep increasing we will have a problem. I think it is important to keep a sense of perspective and common sense in government to make sure that we don't do anything to make these matters worse.
5. Value for Money
I work for a major multi-national business and have worked at The Houses of Parliament and have witnessed at first hand how inefficent government can be. Rushmoor is one of the more efficient councils in the UK and I am determined to make sure that we keep getting value for money for our tax pounds.
I will continue to post on these subjects and other subjects of interest as my campaign progresses.
I am happy to say that I am now formally the Conservative Party Candidate for Empress Ward in Farnborough.
I have lived in Farnborough since mid 2006 and work locally. I have also been actively involved in politics for 11 years.
For me the top issues in Farnborough are:
1. Making sure that our town centre is developed in a way that maximises its benefit to residents and local businesses.
It has been a long time coming but I think the new town centre could do wonders for the life and economy of Farnborough.
It would be great to have more facilities and to see the character of our town redeveloped- and to benefit from the new jobs that would bring. We must however be careful to make sure that Farnborough doesn't become just another town. We need to keep what is best about our town whilst embracing change.
2. Ensuring that we look after our green spaces and facilities
Having lived in many towns throughout the UK I can honestly say that Farnborough is very well catered for in terms of parks, green spaces and sports facilities. We do need to make sure that they stay pleasant and accessible to all. It is easy to underestimate the impact that these kind of facilities can have in adding to the good character of the town, reducing anti-social behaviour and benefiting local property prices. Lets keep Farnborough green!
3. Cleaning up our streets
Crime, vandalism and litter are a blight on modern Britain and getting steadily worse under the national current government. Rushmoor is doing well to keep these threats under control and I am determined to do my bit on the council to protect Farnborough from the return of these depressing and disappointing afflictions of modern Britain
4. Traffic and Parking
Always an annoyance. It is tempting to believe that these problems can be solved overnight but so long as car numbers keep increasing we will have a problem. I think it is important to keep a sense of perspective and common sense in government to make sure that we don't do anything to make these matters worse.
5. Value for Money
I work for a major multi-national business and have worked at The Houses of Parliament and have witnessed at first hand how inefficent government can be. Rushmoor is one of the more efficient councils in the UK and I am determined to make sure that we keep getting value for money for our tax pounds.
I will continue to post on these subjects and other subjects of interest as my campaign progresses.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
